NR599: Week 3: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

We guarantee an original paper free from Plagiarism.

Order a Similar Paper Order Different Paper

We got you covered for the whole semester.

Week 3: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

Purpose

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)
  • Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)

Due Date:

Students must post a minimum of 3 times in each graded discussion. The 3 posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days. Posting 3 times on 3 different days meets the minimum requirement for full credit; each post must be substantive. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 3. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 150 Points

Requirements NR599: Week 3: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks:

Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:

  1. As discussed in the lesson and assigned reading for this week, EHRs provide both benefits and drawbacks. Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table and include at least 3 items for each list. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you selected to include it on the respective list.
  2. Refer to the Stage 3 objectives for Meaningful Use located in this week’s lesson under the heading Meaningful Use and the HITECH Act. Select two objectives to research further. In your own words, provide a brief discussion as to how the objective may impact your role as an APN in clinical practice.

Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:

    • Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
    • Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
    • Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.
    • Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.

For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.

UNV 504 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment 1

Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

NR599: Week 3: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Application of Course Knowledge 50 33% The quality for this category is determined by the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lessons and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources 40 27% This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.
Interactive Dialogue 40 27% The quality for this category is determined by substantive written responses to a peer and faculty member’s questions in the threaded discussion. Substantive posts add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion. Students must respond to least one peer in the threaded discussion. If no question asked directly from faculty, student must respond to questions posed to the entire class. Post must include at least one scholarly source.
Total CONTENT Points= 130
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format 20 13% Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post. * APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included. **Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion
Total FORMAT Points= 20
DISCUSSION TOTAL= 150 Points

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

Search entries or author Filter replies by unreadUnread Collapse replies Expand replies

ReplyReply to Week 3: EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks

Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one reply.

PreviousNext

To

September 2022

Rubric

NR599 WK3 Threaded Discussion_SEPT19

NR599 WK3 Threaded Discussion_SEPT19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge Must demonstrate the following elements:
• Creates a “Pros” versus “Cons” table regarding EHRs.
• Table included at least three items for each “Pro” and each “Con”.
• Provided a brief rationale as to why each item was selected for the respective list.
• Discussion thread was guided by the Stage 3 objectives for Meaningful Use.
• Selected two objectives from the Meaningful Use document.
• Provided a brief discussion as to how each objective may impact the role of the APN in clinical practice.

(6 Required Elements)
50 pts Full Marks Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion 46 pts V. Good Missing 1 element for the Criterion 42 pts Satisfactory Missing 2 elements for the Criterion 26 pts Needs Improvement Missing 3 elements for the Criterion 0 pts Unsatisfactory Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No Discussion Thread 50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarliness and Scholarly Sources Must demonstrate the following elements:
• Discussion posts are supported with appropriate, scholarly sources
• Provided relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
• Evaluated literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis
• Sources were published within the last 5 years;
• Reference list was provided and in-text citations match
• Threaded discussion posts contains no more than 1 direct quote (if quote is used it contains <15 words and adds substantively to the reflection)

(6 Required Elements)
40 pts Full Marks Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion 36 pts V. Good Missing 1 element for the Criterion 34 pts Satisfactory Missing 2 elements for the Criterion 20 pts Needs Improvement Missing 3 elements for the Criterion 0 pts Unsatisfactory Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No Discussion Thread 40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue Must demonstrate the following elements:
• Must interact with more than one initial post
• Responses to peer/faculty were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)
• Provided scholarly source for each post
• Responded to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

(4 Required Elements)
40 pts Full Marks Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion 36 pts V. Good Missing 1 element for the Criterion 34 pts Satisfactory Missing 2 elements for the Criterion 20 pts Needs Improvement Missing 3 elements for the Criterion 0 pts Unsatisfactory Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No Discussion Thread 40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format 20 pts Full Marks 0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format 18 pts V. Good 2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format 16 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format 10 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format 0 pts Unsatisfactory 8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format Or No Discussion Thread 20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation 0 pts Manual Deductions A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0) 0 pts Total Participation Responses A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days: 3 days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)  

Hello, this question is here because we've worked on this and other similar assignments. If you don't know the answer, you can ask us for help. We guarantee an original paper free from Plagiarism.

Order a Similar Paper Order Different Paper

You can trust us with any of your assignments. We got you covered for the whole semester. We dedicate one writer to do all your assignments