Aristotle Account Of Human Good And Human Function

We guarantee an original paper free from Plagiarism.

Order a Similar Paper Order Different Paper

We got you covered for the whole semester.


Table of Contents

Discuss Aristotle’s Account of Human Good & Human Function.


There are many views about human good that can differ depending on who you ask.

While there are differences between Plato’s, Socrates’ and Aristotle’s views, some points can be grouped together.

Aristotle says that the only way to achieve human goodness is through practicing what is good, not by simply learning about them.

There are many different ways of looking at what is good and you can have different definitions.

Plato and Socrates initially had different views of human good.

Aristotle arrived and offered his views and understanding. He was eventually able to agree to Plato and Socrates’ views, while others disagreed.

This paper will discuss Aristotle’s view on human good and function and the ways he uses Plato, Socrates and others in his argument.

Aristotle’s ability to use different human virtues to explain how he understands these factors and how they affect human functioning is an important part of his understanding.

Aristotle’s main focus is on whether one of the human goodnesses is more important than another.

Aristotle defines each of the human goodnesses as having its own characteristic.

These characteristics can then be used to evaluate virtues and determine how they should function.

Aristotle can raise the major question of how human beings function in their lives.

Aristotle draws on psychological and biological arguments to support his main points about the account for human good.

Rationality in the soul is a key component that can enhance the good of human beings.

Aristotle says that soul is required for the achievement of any virtue.

He also addresses the human need to be happy.

He is able conclude that happiness is an individual thing and that everyone is capable of defining their own happiness.

Aristotle states that happiness is not an attribute and that activities are the key to being happy.

Plato and Aristotle both view man’s perfection and happiness the same.

Aristotle views the human perfections differently[3].

Aristotle says that the key question to be answered is “What is human good?” or “What is happiness?”

The key area of ethics must be understood in depth in order to attain happiness in human lives.

Aristotle can follow Socrates’ key points and arguments in his analysis of ethics [4].

However, one key difference can be found in Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates’ analysis of their views.

Aristotle states that ethics is not theoretical.

These are not theoretical concepts and must be practiced.

He is able insist that the human need to learn knowledge can lead to the question of “what is good for humanity.”

This results in the development of the learner.

Aristotle doesn’t just focus on compiling the list of good things, since anyone can do that.

Aristotle is able focus on the more difficult aspect of the human good, where he raises concerns about what human good factors are better than other.

Aristotle can prove that all the factors are essential in this instance.

However, Aristotle insists that the relative importance of the various factors can be affected by the situations in which they are being used[5].

Aristotle can also ask the question whether these factors would be desirable to others, and how they could be used.

Aristotle can conclude that these factors are important to people with different needs because they have the ability to determine their importance individually.

Aristotle further identifies that human good factors must be viewed from an individual perspective to determine the best way to solve their problems.

The highest human good must have three characteristics according to Aristotle.

He first believes that this good must be desirable for it self.

This means that the good must be able to satisfy its own needs.

Second, it should not be necessary for the sake or another good.

It must be able to serve its own purposes and benefit.

This is why all goods should be desirable.

This means that all other goods must be able support the wellbeing and well-being of the good.

According to Aristotle, the good for humans must meet these characteristics.

Aristotle can agree that happiness comes from two components: well and spirit. But he doesn’t mention the spirit component when describing the human good and happiness.

The human state of mind can control how well you live, and whether or not it leads to happiness.

This means that anyone can think of anything that will bring about happiness and human well-being.

He can also agree with the fact that every person wants to live in a state of happiness.

To achieve this level of happiness, there are also subordinate needs.

These include wealth, health, and any other resources that are capable of promoting the well-being.

Aristotle can also insist that the subordinate goods are not necessary to attain happiness.

These subordinate goods are not important in determining happiness.

The psychological emotions control the mind, so achieving the human good depends on the biological as well as psychological components [7].

He insists that human goodness is part of the human soul. This is responsible for human growth, reproduction, perceptions, and other aspects.

These factors can be a major factor in the attainment of human happiness and human good.

Aristotle can also insist that one is responsible for feeling happiness.

When Aristotle refers to happiness as having one’s own, this is his main point.

This means one must control his or her happiness by identifying and doing the good.

This will help you maintain your different state to achieve the good.

His theory is based upon refining one’s position and how one can view happiness.

He is able demonstrate that living well and being able achieve happiness is not just a state.

Aristotle shows that happiness is dependent on the soul in order to achieve human goodness and happiness[8].

He also notes that the activities and virtues of life and the rational part of the soul can play a crucial role in ensuring happiness and good health.

Aristotle can also add that the path to happiness must be accompanied by other factors like wealth, power, friends and family.

The state of happiness is often endangered when there is a lack of these [9]supportive components.

In this argument, he can raise the question of why it must be so while the soul controls the state.

He points out that happiness can only be diminished if there is no supply of these goods, which are able lead to the attainment of virtuous activity.

These are the key components of achieving happiness.

They are essential for achieving happiness.

My view is that ethics must be able to guide human life and function.

It is important to have supportive ethical characters in order to improve the functioning and well-being of society.

Aristotle also supports happiness and living well. This can sometimes lead to the best human happiness.

Aristotle is able conclude that the state of highest goodness does not happen by chance. One must work hard to achieve it. This is the secret to a happy and fulfilled life.

Aristotle can offer his view of the human good and the requirements to achieve that status.

It is evident that the individual is responsible for creating the state and not just luck.

Additionally, there are many supportive factors that can help achieve the happiness of the soul.

Morality and virtue can play an important role in the attainment of happiness and the advancement of humanity.

To achieve this state of happiness, wealth, friends, and health are key factors.

Kraut Richard “Aristotle’s Ethics”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer

“Human Goods and Human Function.”

Hughes, Gerard J. Routledge Guidebook of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.

Florence: Taylor and Francis. 2013.

Sovereign Virtue. Aristotle on Happiness and Prosperity.

Stanford, Calif. Stanford University Press, 1992.

Hutchins Robert M., and Mortimer J. Adler.

The Great Ideas Today.

Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1961.

Internet resource.

Flaman Paul J. P. “Evolutionary Origins of Human Persons and Original Sin”

The Heythrop Journal.


Strauss D.F.M.

The Fruitfulness and Sovereignty of the Principle of Sphere.

Aristotle’s Ethics, Moral Development and Human Nature.

Hello, this question is here because we've worked on this and other similar assignments. If you don't know the answer, you can ask us for help. We guarantee an original paper free from Plagiarism.

Order a Similar Paper Order Different Paper

You can trust us with any of your assignments. We got you covered for the whole semester. We dedicate one writer to do all your assignments