Two works of art should be chosen in the same medium. These could be paintings, pieces of sculpture, decorative art/design objects, etc.
These should be artifacts you have seen in person. They must be from between 1960 and the present.
You should think about how to link your two objects in a logical fashion so that you create a dialog between them.
Over the centuries, art has developed a vast array of styles, movements, forms, and art forms.
Many art styles were able to rise and fall over the past two centuries, as well as the emergence of new ones.
All of these art styles can be grouped under the umbrella of contemporary art. They all display great variation in their skill, media, and techniques.
The majority of these artistic works made an impact in this time period, either quickly or over a longer period.
Some of them are still very popular today.
In general, the 1980s were marked by conservative social and political views.
The 1980s also witnessed the rise of popular music cultures. This was reflected in the art at the time, with some artists using their skills to express their opinions on political and/or social issues.
Appropriation was an idea that originated in the 1970s and spread to the 1980s. It was heavily based on borrowing.
Artists modified images or objects already existing.
Artists created amazing art using images from everyday life and pop culture.
Nicholas Canyon, by David Hockney was an adaptation of the Hollywood Hills area’s art.
Neo-expressionism was an art form that emerged in the late 1970s in response to conceptual art which became very popular in 1970s.
Although the styles of earlier art did not include traditional art ideas, this style did.
Remarkable objects were the focus. Artists used vivid colors and rough handling of materials to create art.
Farewell to Crete, by Malcolm Morley, is an example of this art.
Farewell to Crete, as well as Nicholas Canyon, were drawn during the same time frame using the same medium. Both have had a great impact on contemporary art, and are now widely recognized in both the 1980s and the present.
Both the content and the way the artist handled the materials in Farewell to Crete are different. While David Canyon seems too bright, Farewell to Crete looks too dark.
Nicholas Canyon was a two-dimensional painting by David Hockney in 1980.
It is currently on view at a Private collection and measures 152.4cm by 213.3cm.
The painting was done using acrylic on canvas.
Nicholas Canyon is painted in true fauvist styles.
David Hockney is one the greatest and most influential living English painters.
The painting is eye-catching, just as all of his other paintings.
Surficially, the intense colours demand attention. This causes viewers to look at the canvas from all angles.
The painting was taken from the same area in Hollywood as the name, located in Los Angeles, Californa.
The painting perfectly depicts the destination.
The darkened road is slightly exaggerated. However, the contrast with the richly coloured blue waters in the background draws attention to the scenery.
David Hockney commented that he enjoyed the wavy lines.
The scene on the painting is highly expressive, with a torrent of multicoloured hues that seem to celebrate Hockney’s love for Nicholas Canyon.
The road is lined with several small houses, each one unique but coloured and shaped in the same way.
It is difficult to criticize the painting for what it represents.
The painting is simply a representation of an artist’s wild imagination combined with extreme emotional expression.
This is a stunning decorative piece that every pop or fauvist artist would love to have.
Although David Hockney denies that he’s a pop artist. However, most of his fans consider him one after seeing his earlier works.
Malcolm Morley painted Farewell to Crete in 1984.
Like Nicholas Canyon, it is painted on canvas.
This painting uses oil to replace Hockney’s acrylic.
The painting measures 203.2cm by 416.6cm.
Farewell to Crete is three-dimensionally larger than Nicholas Canyon.
The painting looks dark, and the artist appears to have used his materials incorrectly.
The practice was popular in 1980s art, but it is not true.
Farewell to Crete provides a foundation for Morley’s criticism of beliefs.
While many of his works have caused controversy over beliefs, Farewell To Crete stands out as the most evidence-based and ambitious painting.
Farewell to Crete was created by the combination of Morley’s 1982 works Untitled, Palms of Vai and Farewell.
The painting is dependent on a complex network, if not entirely, of pairs.
The right-hand painting depicts two fertility gods. In the foreground, there is a naked couple, and in the middle, a bull and horse.
All of the couples appear to be disjunctive.
The heads of the two fertility goddesses, who are blindly observing various vertical panels, appear detached from their rest.
The bronze horse is facing the clay bull, even though they are in different vertical panels.
The bodies of the couple are also visible in different vertical panels with their faces hidden.
In ideal circumstances, the central pair of paintings is composed of both the traditional and modern worlds.
The tranquil beach, with its majestic sands of the time and the waters of the sea, enhances the view of blood of the bull.
Although the modern world is made up of the Trojan horse and Cretan bull, it’s easy to forget that the ancient sands were full of blood and cruelty.
Farewell to Crete, Nicholas Canyon, and Farewell to Crete were created by well-known British nationals who came to America to further their careers.
David Hockney was born in England, in Bradford in 1937. He moved from England to Los Angeles in California.
Hockney was an accomplished artist who worked as a painter/stage designer, a draftsman, photographer and printmaker.
His major contributions to pop art in the middle of the 20th century were immense.
Nicholas Canyon was inspired from Hockney’s residence.
Two places were his California homes, where he resided from 1964 to 1965.
His Hollywood Hills home was the inspiration for Nicholas Canyon.
Malcolm Morley was a British-American painter and artist who was born in London in 1931.
British-American painter and artist, Morley was the pioneer of many art styles.
He worked as both an expressionist and photorealist, among many other styles.
As the World War II bombings of World War II decimated his family, he had a difficult childhood.
In 1957, he returned to New York. At that time, it was the largest location for Western art worldwide.
In 1958, he made the move to New York and met other artists who were instrumental in his success as a painter.
In the 1960s, and 1970s, he taught in various New York art schools.
Morley was awarded the Turner prize in an exhibition held by Whitechapel in London.
He later purchased an abandoned church in New York State and lived there for the remainder of his life.
He still resided in New York at his death in June 2018.
The artworks were created by artists from the same country, and they were also painted simultaneously.
These two works are considered contemporary art.
This indicates that the paintings were done in a similar political and social context.
The artists’ freedom is shared by the works.
They freely use colour to create their works.
The variety of colour combinations in their paintings suggests a freedom and transition.
Both artists are focused on important social aspects.
Hockney paints natural scenes, while Morley portrays past events. However, Morley’s painting is still crafted in a way that fits in with contemporary art through the use of colour.
Critically, they were different in their artistic inspirations.
Art critics are often quick to associate the artworks with the biography of artists.
This could be interpreted as experiential painting.
Hockney’s painting is clear but Morley’s work seems more opaque.
Although both artistic works can be attractive, Morley’s work has more emotional appeal than Hockney’s.
Farewell to Crete can be seen as an expression Morley’s dark childhood.
Morley was the direct victim of Second World War, which saw his family lose their home.
Morley, who was in his teens, was sentenced at the age of 17 to three years imprisonment for petty stealing.
Morley was able to relate to violence, hardships and other situations because of these experiences.
His ambiguous paintings encapsulate his childhood disintegration and unrewarding teenage years.
Hockney was inspired by his travels to create his work.
Nicholas Canyon’s bright colours and simple forms reflect Hockney’s passion for adventure and scenic locations.
Hockney’s Los Angeles lifestyle became a significant feature of his work.
His work shows the brightness of his childhood. He had been educated by well-respected people and was taught by respected teachers.
In addition to being able recognize his talent from a young age he also developed extreme self-awareness.
His reputation in art helped his school award him a diploma despite not meeting its regulations.
He insisted that he be assessed only in art, and refused to submit an essay as a condition for passing his final exam.
The paintings are both on the same medium of canvas but the painters used different materials.
This could be used to explain some of the differences that are easily identifiable between them.
Morley’s oil painting is predominant in most his works.
Hockney previously used oil in some of his paintings, but this was changed for Nicholas Canyon.
Acrylics are used in his painting.
These two works are also different in terms of the possibility of using photography.
Hockney’s artwork depicts extreme photography, particularly for documentation.
Morley’s photography does not seem to be based on any photography skills.
The use of colors in paintings can also vary.
Nicholas Canyon’s colours are well balanced.
Both the background colours and the contents are well blended, creating a stable piece of art.
The paintings’ colours are extremely warm and seem to bring people together to enjoy the artist’s experience.
Morley’s painting uses contrasting colours that emphasize the ambiguity of the painting.
The painting’s contents create tension.
The heads of the goddesses are separated from the rest.
Farewell to Crete is an example of tension in art due to its detachment and incompetent cloud use.
Farewell to Crete focuses more on the supernatural, while Nicholas Canyon is based upon nature.
Without closely borrowing from disciplines that are concerned with beliefs, the contents of Farewell to Crete can’t be explained.
The painting’s essence is to restore ancient art, which was in decline at the time that only a few artists attempted traditional art.
Nicholas Canyon is entirely modern, depicting exaggerated scenes from nature.
Hockney simply portrays the ideal scenic setting.
Farewell to Crete, Nicholas Canyon, and Nicholas Canyon were both painted during the same period. However they have some very similar features but are quite different when examined in detail.
These paintings are similar in that they use a wide range of colours, both in terms of composition and brightness.
They also cover a variety of themes because they are painted by painters with diverse biographical backgrounds.
They are a great representation of the diversity of art that existed during the same time period.
Malcolm Morley: Painting.
FL: Museum of Contemporary Art North Miami.
Exploring Crete 2017 Diary: Day 13: Farewell.
Retrieved December 13, 2018,
The 1980s Contemporary Art Styles: A Look.
Malcolm Morley at Ashmolean – Paintings and Drawings From the Hall Collection.
“Malcolm Morley: I was struck by the fact that anyone could call my work art when I first saw it. I found myself in a lot of trouble.
December 16, 2018.